Materials Available
Spotlight Menu
Theo-Logical Current & Archive
The Plan of Salvation

Religious Ecumenism

Catholic Salvation
Catholic Grace
The Roman Spin Zone
Historical Perspective
Noteworthy
Analysis of ECT
Manhattan Declaration
Examination of Accord
Doctrinal Statement
Apologetics Zone
Our References
Host a Seminar
Same Sex Marriage?
Infant Baptism
The Bible Alone?
Defining the Terms
Was Mary in Need
The Marketing of Merit
Mass Deception
E.C.T. Statement
G.S. Document
Dominus Declaration
CLICK HERE TO
SEARCH OUR SITE
Chris Arnzen Blog  :: Iron Sharpens Iron
Remember The Reformation Conference
cwrc-rz.org
Get Macromedia Flash Player FREE! Real Player
Print Page Print Page

SACRAMENTUM ABSURDUM

The Roman Catholic Religion is established on Sacramentalism. Rome believes that Jesus Christ left for His Bride, the Body of Christ, a system of religious rituals by which, if followed, one can be saved.

“Sacraments are the means appointed by God for the attainment of eternal salvation. Three of them are in the ordinary way of salvation so necessary, that without their use salvation cannot be attained.”1

“As Christ instituted the Sacraments and bound them up with the communication of grace they are necessary to us for the achievement of salvation even if not all are necessary for each individual.”2

“The sacraments are perceptible signs (words and actions) accessible to our human nature. By the action of Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit they make present efficaciously the grace that they signify.”3

Rome teaches that the operation of the Sacrament brings about the intended result. In other words, the administration of the word and action, by an official Romish minister, actually brings about the thing signified by that very word and action. Or, as Ott explains: “The Sacraments operate by the power of the Sacramental Rite.”4

Lest we think that the Sacraments are magical and work regardless of the disposition of the person receiving the Sacrament, Rome adds the following caveat. “Nevertheless, the fruits of the sacraments also depend on the disposition of the one who receives them.”5 “If anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the grace which they signify, or that they do not confer that grace on those who do not place an obstacle in the way..”6

Distilled to their essence, Romish Sacraments are said to have been given by Jesus Christ, for administration through the Roman Catholic priesthood, to bring about what they signify, being necessary for salvation [though not all are given to everyone individually] provided the person receiving them cooperates. Specifically, Roman Catholic Baptism is said to regenerate and initiate a process of justification. Confirmation is said to bring down the gift of the Holy Spirit. Penance is said to effect forgiveness of post-baptismal sins.

The Roman Catholic Eucharist, or Mass, is said to be the antidote for daily faults and a preservative against mortal sins. Marriage is said to confer grace. Extreme Unction is said to forgive sins in preparation for imminent death and relieve the sick. Holy Orders is said to establish a priesthood which can offer the sacrifice of Christ repeatedly, hear confession, set penance and remit sins. Those who take Marriage cannot take Holy Orders and vice - versa.

Foundational to the entire Sacramental system of Rome is the presupposition that salvation is incremental, justification progressive and Rome is the dispenser of redemption. In addition, the death of Christ has merely secured grace, which is then infused from heaven through the sacramental process. Heaven awaits those who have been sanctified enough, through infused grace, via the sacramental routine.

Purgatory is reserved for those who have not been cleansed throughly enough in this life. A Purgatorial cleansing yet awaits those who land there. Un-Packing All of This The difficulty in un-tangling a bag of ropes is knowing where to begin.

To understand Rome’s intricately woven Sacramental tapestry, we must start with Rome’s presuppositions. Rome has always presumed Peter to have been especially imbued by God to be the preeminent apostle. In line with this is the assumption that Peter was the first Bishop of Rome, and left to his successor a primacy of jurisdiction over all of Christendom.

Rome understands Christian history as the unfolding revelation of the primacy of the Roman Bishop culminating in modern Papal infallibility. At heart, Rome believes that Peter was both a preacher of the gospel and the most able interpreter of the gospel. In line with this is the development of Rome’s doctrine of Sola Ecclesia or The Church Alone. Peter’s successors soon came to assume a greater degree of influence when it came to interpreting the Word of God. Rome understands Christian history as the unfolding of Rome’s dominance in the teaching of the Word of God. Though appealing to various Fathers of early Church history, and seeking biblical warrant for its dogmas, doctrines, decrees and interpretations, Rome has essentially emerged as Sola Ecclesia Romanus i.e., only the church at Rome.

It should not be surprising, given this milieu, that a sacramental system has developed over the centuries. With the presupposition that the bishop of Rome has the final interpretation, we can expect no less than a system of universal and “womb to tomb” control. The Protestant Reformation was ignited by men who essentially mis-read Rome. They were under the delusion that Rome’s ultimate presupposition was Sola Scriptura i.e., the Bible Alone. It was the goal of Luther, for instance, to show forth from Scripture that the sale of indulgences was wrong. Little did Luther realize that the confessing world of Christendom had long ago relinquished Sola Scriptura to Sola Ecclesia Romanus.

We cannot get to the first thread of Rome’s Sacramental tapestry without visiting the essential role of Peter. Everything begins with the assumption of Peter being put over the other apostles and his successors being given the same status. Everything ends up with Peter being put “over the Word” as the interpreter of the Word and consequently, Rome “over the Word,” with Rome the interpreter of the Word.

In straightforward laymen’s language, somewhere in history, someone in Rome began it all by saying, “We are in the place of Peter and we give Peter the greatest place. Hence, let us interpret with the same authority we have given to Peter.” The bishops of Rome have been doing just this for centuries. It is no wonder that faithful adherents to the Roman Catholic Religion go about their sacramental duties willingly without question. They have been bred into their religion. They have been told in every way possible that the Roman Catholic religion is the successor of St. Peter and all authority to interpret the Bible resides within the Vatican. They have been taught to think of the Pope at Rome as the Vicar of Christ on earth and Infallible when speaking ex cathedra [from the chair of Peter].

The sacramental, incremental, dispensary religion of Rome amounts to a blind trust in Sola Ecclesia. The way it works in Rome is that Rome has the “say” in what the Bible teaches. Those who surrender their Bibles to Rome say “no” to Sola Scriptura, the Bible only. They have set sail for a heavenly eternity on the Sacramental Ship of Rome. They will not arrive at their intended destination.

The Christian Response When the sovereign God of the universe convicts a poor lost sinner of his need for the righteousness of Christ there is also put into that heart an implicit trust in the Scriptures. The Lord brings the Word to the convicted sinner and then feeds this new, born again, creation with the Word for the rest of his life. All Christians, everywhere, without exception, take the Bible as the only Word of God and treasure its teaching more than life itself. The Word of God is the Bible and it stands over the believer and over the community of believers. Every person born from above embraces Sola Scriptura. The Bible rules, not the Church. Rome despises the very thought of Sola Scriptura. It does so because it cannot imagine a world gone berserk with each person holding onto his own Bible and becoming his own little demagogue.

Rome thinks it absurd that individual Christians should be allowed to interpret the Bible on their own. This, they say, will certainly lead to a thousand different denominations and millions of individual interpretations. The misgiving is that the world will be swamped with cults all operating from their own peculiar interpretation of the Bible. Theological chaos will mark the world. Or so it is feared. Surely God would not allow this to happen, say they. And yet this is exactly what God has done. He has spread His Word abroad and given it out freely. God has not feared those who would twist His Word to their own destruction. God has not a worry about a million denominations emerging all claiming to have interpreted the Bible rightly.

What is to be dreaded more is an elite company of men interpreting a select group of passages from Scripture so as to give them total control and power. We are reminded of these sobering words from the Bible:

JOH 16:2 “They will make you outcasts from the synagogue, but an hour is coming for everyone who kills you to think that he is offering service to God.”

What makes one shudder is the thought of a cradle to grave monolithic religion which hides away the Word of God while holding captive those who have been convinced to relinquish their Bibles. A thousand denominations claiming legitimate Christianity, holding their Bibles up high for the world to see, is to be preferred over the menacing unbiblical religion of Rome. For, despite all the clamoring of the cults, the Christian is certain that the Lord knows those who are His own. The Christian is also convinced that the meaning and interpretation of the Bible is not elusive in matters pertaining to salvation and sanctification.

To be sure there are myriads of interpretations centering around a profusion of constructs and concepts stemming from the Bible’s vast array of revelation. But there is only one Gospel message for salvation. That message is clear. God justifies the ungodly through faith in Jesus Christ. Faith in Jesus Christ is confidence in God’s promise to forgive all sins solely on the basis of Christ’s death. Trust in the finished work of Christ excludes all works of personal righteousness and religious rituals for acceptance before God.

“For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, that no one should boast.” EPH 2:8,9

Just as David also speaks of the blessing upon the man to whom God reckons righteousness apart from works:

“Blessed are those whose lawless deeds have been forgiven, And whose sins have been covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will not take into account.” ROM 4:6,7,8.

We wonder, what part of “you are saved by grace through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is a gift of God; not as a result of works” is difficult to understand? The New Testament sets forth clearly salvation through faith alone, as a gift of God, by the finished work of Christ alone. The Bible is clear enough that salvation does not depend upon works of the law or good works done in righteousness, or religious ceremonies nor any other sacrifice offered by man.

Let us eavesdrop on an imaginary, yet realistic, conversation between a Roman Catholic and a Christian. “The Bible does not set forth a sacramental, incremental salvation portioned out by a so-called Mother Church.” preaches the Christian. “Who says so?” asks Rome. “We say so,” says the Christian with his Bible opened to Ephesians 2:8,9. “What gives you the right to interpret the Bible differently than those who have been given the seat of Peter?” asks Rome. “Ah, there is the rub, we do not believe that you have been given the seat of Peter; and even Peter was obligated to obey the Word,” says the Christian, now clinging to Galatians 2:11-14. “You have a morbid interest in personal interpretations and are responsible for founding thousands of cults!” cries Rome. “Not so,” says the Christian. “We are only reading what is given directly to us in the Bible,” now clutching Romans 4. “You have no authority to interpret the Bible and your interpretations are wrong!” thunders Rome. “How then shall we be saved?” asks the Christian as he holds fast to Titus 3:5. “Through the sacraments of Rome,” comes the reply. “Never, not now and not ever,” laments the Christian as he presses his Bible tightly in his hands and wonders at those who have given it up to Rome.

Everyone, everywhere, must understand that the battle with Romish Sacraments starts with the battle for Sola Scriptura. The battle for Sola Scriptura starts with the role of Peter and Rome’s insistence on Apostolic Succession. If Rome is right on Sola Ecclesia, then Rome can interpret the Bible anyway it wants and all are bound to follow. If Rome is wrong, and we do not doubt it for a second, then Rome is to be removed from any consideration as a part of The Body of Christ.

Sacraments-What are they good for?

The word sacrament is not found in the Bible. Although Rome mistakingly translates musterion in Ephesians 5:32 [see Douay-Rheims]as “sacrament.” The word musterion means mystery, or secret doctrine. It is translated as “mystery” throughout the New Testament. The word “sacrament” is a Latin term meaning, among other things, to sign on as giving an oath or to pledge allegiance. Evidently, this Latin term was picked up by Rome to illustrate for them that God was giving an oath of some sort in its religious rituals. Hence, the name “sacrament” is used. It is, however, foreign to the Bible both as a term and as a concept.

Sacraments are not necessary to secure the promises of God in Christ.

  1. Sacraments are not necessary to experience God’s wondrous grace: 2TI 1:9 “who has saved us, and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was granted us in Christ Jesus from all eternity,”
  2. Sacraments are not necessary for justification: GAL 3:8 “And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, ‘All the nations shall be blessed in you.’”
  3. Sacraments are not necessary to be a son of Abraham: GAL 3:7 “Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham.”
  4. Sacraments have no part in the preaching of the Gospel for salvation: 1TH 2:4 “but just as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the gospel, so we speak, not as pleasing men but God, who examines our hearts.”
  5. Sacraments are not necessary to be called sons of God: GAL 3:26 “For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus.”

The Sacraments of Rome are gouged out of Scripture by the most sinister means of Scripture Twisting this side of Mormonism. Baptismal regeneration is yanked out of the third chapter of John’s Gospel and tossed in with Colossians 2:11-13 and 1 Peter 3:21 to “prove” one is born again by water! Infants are said to qualify for this “water regeneration” by contorting Acts 2:38,39, along with the household baptisms of the New Testament, to bring on board infant baptismal regeneration.

Confirmation is gouged out of Acts 8 where Peter and John lay hands on believing Samaritans to receive the Holy Spirit. Holy Orders is wrenched from John 20:23 where our Lord breathes upon His disciples and gives them authority to remit and retain sin. Penance is fabricated from Matthew 16:19 under the “power of the keys” given to Peter by our Lord. The re-presentation of Christ on an un-bloody Roman altar is wrested from John 6 where our Lord says to His disciples that they must eat His flesh and drink His blood. Extreme Unction is clawed out of James 5 where James encourages the sick to call for an anointing from the Elders.

Keep in mind, if Rome has the Scriptural “say” in all of this, then we are utterly against Christ and His Gospel and His Church in devoting our time trying to save some out of Rome. We are, in fact, condemned. There is no middle ground. Either Rome is right, or Rome is wrong. Either we have interpreted the Bible correctly, or they have. There is every indication that the apostle Paul ran into the same “either/or” proposition with his countrymen according to the flesh, his own nation Israel. But far from backing down, Paul stood erect with the rest of the New Testament writers. Even Peter came along in time, to declare that they had seen a greater city than Jerusalem. They had been released from the tyranny of the law of Israel and gone off to pursue the City of God. In so doing, they lamented the “zeal for God without knowledge” so prevalent in Israel. But they were convinced by God that Christ was the end of the law for righteousness. They could not stay in a system which knew not the righteousness of God [Christ’s righteousness through faith alone] and sought to establish its own righteousness. Likewise, today, we set off for the City of God leaving behind the zealous sacramental righteousness of the religion of Rome.

ROM 10:3 “For not knowing about God’s righteousness, and seeking to establish their own, they did not subject themselves to the righteousness of God.”

Christians begin and end by faith alone in the finished work of Christ alone. For in the Gospel the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith. The Christian does not put his faith in a man-made system of religious rituals. A million gallons of water anointed by a million Romanist priests cannot and will not wash away one stain of Adam’s original sin nor any personal sins. A million gallons of oil mixed with a million gallons of Balsam extract could not make a chrism [anointing] sweet enough to call down the Holy Spirit. A million Romanist priests chanting hoc est enim corpus meum could not change one tiny piece of bread into even a drop of sweat from the Savior’s brow.

I recently wrote an article entitled: “When is Too Much Not Enough?” In that article, I explained that believing the wrong things about the Gospel ultimately ravages the Gospel. Roman Catholics, much like their Jewish predecessors, have a zeal for God but not in accordance with knowledge. Thinking that they are pleasing God, Romanists have heaped up a mountain of things to do and believe which ruins the Gospel. By “faith”, Romanists believe that God has given them a sacramental system. It matters not to the Romanist that to believe in a sacramental system for salvation annihilates true faith and the free gift of salvation, which God gives through faith in Christ alone without the need for sacraments. All of Rome’s “faith” in rituals, symbols, priests, popes, Mary, purgatorial cleansing, self atonement for sins and the constant representation of Christ as a victim on a bloodless altar annihilate any real faith in the promises of God. Rome’s “faith” in their own sacramental system simply obliterates the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is another Gospel. QL

1 Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Ludwig Ott. Pgs. 340, 341.
2 Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Ludwig Ott. Pg. 340
3 Catechism of the Catholic Church. Paragraph 1084.
4 Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma. Pg. 329.
5 Catechism of the Catholic Church. Paragraph 1128.
6 The Sources of Catholic Dogma. Henry Denzinger. Pg. 262 and Paragraph 849.

Top
Copyright © MMX A Christian Witness to Roman Catholicism
Designed & Hosted by SX Web Solutions
HOME | ABOUT | ARTICLES | MATERIALS AVAILABLE | LINKS | CONTACT